Blm v. Anco Operating Co
Blm v. Anco Operating Co is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 09/27/1995 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 07/10/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Paul G. Hatfield · 702 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-00104
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 09/27/1995
- Date terminated
- 07/10/1996
313 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Blm · 50 cases
- defendant · Anco Operating Co · 3 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
ANCO Operating Co is named in 3 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Blm v. Anco Operating Co?
Blm v. Anco Operating Co is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 09/27/1995 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 07/10/1996. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 4:95-cv-00104.
When was the case filed?
Blm v. Anco Operating Co was filed on 09/27/1995. It was terminated on 07/10/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 20857915 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-00104 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).