Bolden v. Scott
Bolden v. Scott is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/09/2014 in the District Court, E.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 06/02/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Texas (E.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Keith F. Giblin · 95 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:14-cv-00266
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/09/2014
- Date terminated
- 06/02/2014
15,592 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bolden v. Scott?
Bolden v. Scott is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/09/2014 in the District Court, E.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 06/02/2014. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Texas, docket number 1:14-cv-00266.
When was the case filed?
Bolden v. Scott was filed on 05/09/2014. It was terminated on 06/02/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14410919 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:14-cv-00266 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).