Botello v. MidFirst Bank
Botello v. MidFirst Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/08/2018 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 07/05/2018.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sam R Cummings · 4,620 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:18-cv-01175
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/08/2018
- Date terminated
- 07/05/2018
1,781 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Botello · 59 cases
- defendant · Midfirst Bank · 240 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
MIDFIRST BANK is named in 240 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Botello v. MidFirst Bank?
Botello v. MidFirst Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/08/2018 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 07/05/2018. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:18-cv-01175.
When was the case filed?
Botello v. MidFirst Bank was filed on 05/08/2018. It was terminated on 07/05/2018.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13517165 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:18-cv-01175 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).