Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Bourgal v. Tully

Labor Terminated 12/10/1993 District Court, E.D. New York

Bourgal v. Tully is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/24/1993 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 12/10/1993.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Jack B. Weinstein · 5,757 cases in index
Docket number
1:93-cv-00836
Nature of suit
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
02/24/1993
Date terminated
12/10/1993

29,556 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Bourgal · 180 cases
  • defendant · Tully · 113 cases

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bourgal v. Tully?

Bourgal v. Tully is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/24/1993 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 12/10/1993. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 1:93-cv-00836.

When was the case filed?

Bourgal v. Tully was filed on 02/24/1993. It was terminated on 12/10/1993.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 9727526).