Boutos v. Alt
Boutos v. Alt is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/10/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/12/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Paul G Rosenblatt · 2,105 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-01632
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/10/1998
- Date terminated
- 07/12/1999
827 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Boutos v. Alt?
Boutos v. Alt is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/10/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/12/1999. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:98-cv-01632.
When was the case filed?
Boutos v. Alt was filed on 09/10/1998. It was terminated on 07/12/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10836067 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-01632 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).