Boyd v. Cockrell
Boyd v. Cockrell is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/01/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 10/29/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Texas (S.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Hayden Head · 1,967 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:03-cv-00405
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 10/01/2003
- Date terminated
- 10/29/2003
8,219 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Boyd v. Cockrell?
Boyd v. Cockrell is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/01/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 10/29/2003. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Texas, docket number 2:03-cv-00405.
When was the case filed?
Boyd v. Cockrell was filed on 10/01/2003. It was terminated on 10/29/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14016623 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:03-cv-00405 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).