Boyd v. Glickman
Boyd v. Glickman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/28/1998 in the District Court, M.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 07/09/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Alabama (M.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- W. Harold Albritton, III · 2,842 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:98-cv-00083
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 01/28/1998
- Date terminated
- 07/09/1998
811 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Boyd v. Glickman?
Boyd v. Glickman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/28/1998 in the District Court, M.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 07/09/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Alabama, docket number 1:98-cv-00083.
When was the case filed?
Boyd v. Glickman was filed on 01/28/1998. It was terminated on 07/09/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10686425 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:98-cv-00083 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).