Brancfield v. Pierce Palmer
Brancfield v. Pierce Palmer is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/14/1990 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/18/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California (C.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/14/1990
- Date terminated
- 12/18/1990
28,337 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Brancfield · 21 cases
- defendant · Pierce Palmer
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Brancfield v. Pierce Palmer?
Brancfield v. Pierce Palmer is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/14/1990 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/18/1990. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. California.
When was the case filed?
Brancfield v. Pierce Palmer was filed on 03/14/1990. It was terminated on 12/18/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9240852 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).