Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuit

Bright v. Bright

Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Terminated 09/23/2014 District Court, D. South Carolina

Bright v. Bright is a federal federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/03/2014 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 09/23/2014.

Court
District Court, D. South Carolina (D.S.C.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Bruce Howe Hendricks · 1,187 cases in index
Docket number
7:14-cv-02142
Nature of suit
890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category.
Jurisdiction
Government defendant
Date filed
06/03/2014
Date terminated
09/23/2014

3,754 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • defendant · Bright · 502 cases

About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits

This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bright v. Bright?

Bright v. Bright is a federal federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/03/2014 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 09/23/2014. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. South Carolina, docket number 7:14-cv-02142.

When was the case filed?

Bright v. Bright was filed on 06/03/2014. It was terminated on 09/23/2014.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 13076498).