Brown v. Fdic
Brown v. Fdic is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/08/1991 in the District Court, D. New Hampshire. The case was terminated on 02/26/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Hampshire (D.N.H.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr · 1,554 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:91-cv-00608
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/08/1991
- Date terminated
- 02/26/1993
304 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Brown v. Fdic?
Brown v. Fdic is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/08/1991 in the District Court, D. New Hampshire. The case was terminated on 02/26/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Hampshire, docket number 1:91-cv-00608.
When was the case filed?
Brown v. Fdic was filed on 11/08/1991. It was terminated on 02/26/1993.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9640515 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:91-cv-00608 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).