Brown v. Ivape Ny, Corp

Court

District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →

Docket number

1:26-cv-02556

Cause

28:1331 Fed. Question
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction

Nature of suit

446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Disability-access claims under the ADA outside the employment context.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

None

Date filed

03/27/2026

54,872 Civil Rights cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Brown · 23252 cases
• defendant · Ivape Ny, Corp · 2 cases

• #1 · Complaint Against Ivape NY, Corp., West Lake 127-129 Second Avenue LLC. Document Filed by Altaune Brown..(Marks, Bradly) 03/27/2026 Request Document
• #2 · Civil Cover Sheet Filed..(Marks, Bradly) 03/27/2026 Request Document
• #3 · Request for Issuance of Summons as to Ivape NY, Corp., and West Lake 127-129 Second Avenue LLC, Re: 1 Complaint. Document Filed by Altaune Brown..(Marks, Bradly) 03/27/2026 Request Document
• Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice 03/30/2026 Request Document
• #4 · Summons Issued 03/30/2026 Request Document
• #5 · Order for Initial Pretrial Conference 03/31/2026 Request Document
• #6 · Mediation Referral Order 03/31/2026 Request Document
• #7 · Affidavit of Service Complaints 04/20/2026 Request Document
• #8 · Affidavit of Service Complaints 04/20/2026 Request Document
• #10 · Notice of Appearance 05/11/2026 Request Document
• #11 · Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement 05/11/2026 Request Document
• #12 · Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement 05/11/2026 Request Document
• #9 · Order: Defendants in This Action Appear to Be in Default. Plaintiff Shall File Any Motion for Default Judgment, in Accordance with the Courts Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases (available at Https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman), Within Two Weeks of the Date of This Order. Plaintiff Should Familiarize Him or Herself with Local Civil Rules 55.1 and 55.2, Which, Along with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4 (J) of the Courts Individual Rules, Govern Defa Ult Judgment Motion Practice Before This Court. Per Local Civil Rule 55.2, a Party Seeking Default Judgment Must Append to the Motion a Clerks Certificate of Default, Which May Be Obtained by Following the Procedure Described in Local Civil Rule 55.1 . to Be Clear: Plaintiff Must File the Motion for Default Judgment, Not Merely the Request for a Clerks Certificate of Default, by the Above Deadline. If Plaintiffs Counsel Submits Calculations in Support of Any Motion for Default Judgment, Plaintiff S Counsel Shall Also Email Native Versions of the Files with the Calculations (i.e., Versions of the Files in Their Original Format, Such as in ".xlsx") to Chambers at [email protected]. If or When a Motion for Def Ault Judgment Is Filed, the Court Will Enter a Further Order Setting a Deadline for Any Opposition and Reply and Scheduling a Show Cause Hearing. If No Motion for Default Judgment Is Filed by the Deadline Set Forth Above, the Case May Be Dismissed Fo R Failure to Prosecute Without Further Notice to the Parties. Plaintiff Shall Serve a Copy of This Order Electronically And/or by First-class Mail on Defendants Within Two Business Days from the Date of This Order and Shall File Proof of Such Service Within Three Business Days of the Date of This Order. SO Ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/11/2026) 05/11/2026 · 1 pp View →
• #13 · Extension of Time to File Answer 05/20/2026 Request Document
• #14 · Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer 05/21/2026 Request Document
• Mediation Conference Scheduled 06/02/2026 Request Document
• Notice of Mediator Assignment 06/02/2026 Request Document
• #15 · Answer to Complaint 06/11/2026 Request Document
• #16 · Notice of Appearance 06/15/2026 Request Document
• #17 · Notice of Settlement 06/15/2026 Request Document
• #18 · Order: the Court Having Been Advised at ECF No. 17 That All Claims Asserted Herein Have Been Settled in Principle, It Is Ordered That the Above-entitled Action Be and Is Hereby Dismissed and Discontinued Without Costs, and Without Prejudice to the Right to Reopen the Action Within Sixty Days of the Date of This Order If the Settlement Is Not Consummated. to Be Clear, Any Application to Reopen Must Be Filed by the Aforementioned Deadline; Any Application to Reopen Filed Thereafter May Be D Enied Solely on That Basis. Further, Requests to Extend the Deadline to Reopen Are Unlikely to Be Granted. If the Parties Wish for the Court to Retain Jurisdiction for the Purposes of Enforcing Any Settlement Agreement, They Must Submit the Agreeme Nt to the Court by the Deadline to Reopen to Be "so Ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 5.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, Unless the Court Orders Otherwise, the Court Will Not Retain Jurisdiction T O Enforce a Settlement Agreement Unless It Is Made Part of the Public Record. Notwithstanding the Foregoing, If the Settlement in This Action Requires Judicial Approval - for Example, Because It Involves a Class Action, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (e), "an Infant or Incompetent Person," See Local Civil Rule 83.2 (a), or Claims Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 Et Seq., See Cheeks V. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) - the Parties Must File a Letter Within Three Business Days of the Entry of This Order Alerting the Court and Proposing a Schedule for Seeking Such Approval. Any Pending Motions Are Moot. All Conferences Are Canceled. the Clerk of Court Is Directed to Close the Case. SO Ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/16/2026) 06/16/2026 · 2 pp View →

These are public U.S. federal court records. Filings already in the free RECAP archive can be viewed at no charge; “Request document” retrieves a copy from PACER on your behalf for a convenience fee. The same records are available directly from PACER and the court.

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Civil Rights cases in our index naming Ivape NY, Corp — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Civil Rights Lawsuits

Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Brown v. Ivape Ny, Corp?

Brown v. Ivape Ny, Corp is a federal civil rights lawsuit filed on 03/27/2026 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Civil Rights” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:26-cv-02556.

When was the case filed?

Brown v. Ivape Ny, Corp was filed on 03/27/2026. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.