Brown v. Slodki
Brown v. Slodki is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/21/1990 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 01/28/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David S. Doty · 6,454 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:90-cv-00969
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/21/1990
- Date terminated
- 01/28/1991
4,756 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Brown v. Slodki?
Brown v. Slodki is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/21/1990 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 01/28/1991. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 4:90-cv-00969.
When was the case filed?
Brown v. Slodki was filed on 12/21/1990. It was terminated on 01/28/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9224220 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:90-cv-00969 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).