Bryan v. Hospice Plus LP
Bryan v. Hospice Plus LP is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/23/2013 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/15/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David C Godbey · 3,299 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:13-cv-03392
- Nature of suit
- 375 False Claims Act
Claims that a party defrauded the federal government, under the False Claims Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/23/2013
- Date terminated
- 05/15/2014
1,781 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Bryan · 781 cases
- defendant · Hospice Plus LP · 2 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Hospice Plus LP is named in 2 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bryan v. Hospice Plus LP?
Bryan v. Hospice Plus LP is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/23/2013 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/15/2014. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:13-cv-03392.
When was the case filed?
Bryan v. Hospice Plus LP was filed on 08/23/2013. It was terminated on 05/15/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13083784 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:13-cv-03392 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).