Bugenhagen v. Zwonitzer
Bugenhagen v. Zwonitzer is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/16/1995 in the District Court, D. Wyoming. The case was terminated on 03/22/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Wyoming (D. Wyo.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William F Downes · 890 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:95-cv-00267
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/16/1995
- Date terminated
- 03/22/1996
53 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Bugenhagen · 10 cases
- defendant · Zwonitzer
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bugenhagen v. Zwonitzer?
Bugenhagen v. Zwonitzer is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/16/1995 in the District Court, D. Wyoming. The case was terminated on 03/22/1996. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Wyoming, docket number 2:95-cv-00267.
When was the case filed?
Bugenhagen v. Zwonitzer was filed on 11/16/1995. It was terminated on 03/22/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10269500 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:95-cv-00267 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).