California, State of v. Panasonic Corporation

Court

District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Laurie J. Michelson · 885 cases in index

Docket number

2:23-cv-13098

Cause

15:1 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act

Nature of suit

410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

12/06/2023

Date terminated

12/07/2023

917 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · California, State of · 53 cases
• defendant · Panasonic Corporation · 60 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 61 Antitrust cases in our index naming Panasonic Corporation — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Switches v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, E.D. MichiganFiled 09/02/2020
• Avnet Incorporated v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 02/07/2019
• Findlay Industries, Inc v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, E.D. MichiganFiled 07/18/2017
• Benchmark Electronics, Inc v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, S.D. TexasFiled 04/18/2017
• State of California v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, E.D. MichiganFiled 11/21/2016
• Martens Cars of Washington, Inc v. Panasonic Corporation
  District Court, E.D. MichiganFiled 02/26/2014

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California, State of v. Panasonic Corporation?

California, State of v. Panasonic Corporation is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 12/06/2023 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 12/07/2023. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:23-cv-13098.

When was the case filed?

California, State of v. Panasonic Corporation was filed on 12/06/2023. It was terminated on 12/07/2023.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act.