Camp v. Summit Technology

Court

District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Paul G. Rosenblatt · 34 cases in index

Docket number

2:98-cv-00891

Cause

18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
18 U.S.C. § 1964 — RICO (civil racketeering)

Nature of suit

410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

05/15/1998

Date terminated

07/07/1999

198 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Camp · 413 cases
• defendant · Summit Technology · 42 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 43 Antitrust cases in our index naming Summit Technology — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Summit Technology v. Lin
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 08/10/1999
• Brisson v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. MinnesotaFiled 06/03/1999
• Carolina Eye Assoc v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 05/05/1999
• Carolina Eye Assoc v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. New JerseyFiled 02/04/1999
• Worcester v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 12/01/1998
• Laser Eye Center Tx v. Summit Technology
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 11/09/1998

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Camp v. Summit Technology?

Camp v. Summit Technology is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 05/15/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/07/1999. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:98-cv-00891.

When was the case filed?

Camp v. Summit Technology was filed on 05/15/1998. It was terminated on 07/07/1999.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 18 U.S.C. § 1964 — RICO (civil racketeering).