Canton v. Mathena
Canton v. Mathena is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/11/1995 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 04/10/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert N. Chatigny · 3,391 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:95-cv-01925
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/11/1995
- Date terminated
- 04/10/1997
1,008 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Canton v. Mathena?
Canton v. Mathena is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/11/1995 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 04/10/1997. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 3:95-cv-01925.
When was the case filed?
Canton v. Mathena was filed on 09/11/1995. It was terminated on 04/10/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10301235 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:95-cv-01925 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).