Cantu v. Easter
Cantu v. Easter is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/15/2006 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/29/2007.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert W. Pratt · 1,592 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:06-cv-00060
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 02/15/2006
- Date terminated
- 03/29/2007
510 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cantu v. Easter?
Cantu v. Easter is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/15/2006 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/29/2007. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa, docket number 4:06-cv-00060.
When was the case filed?
Cantu v. Easter was filed on 02/15/2006. It was terminated on 03/29/2007.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12276677 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:06-cv-00060 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).