Carlisle Companies Incorporated v. Crompton Corporation

Court

District Court, N.D. New York (N.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Frederick J. Scullin Jr. · 110 cases in index

Docket number

5:05-cv-00684

Cause

15:1 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act

Nature of suit

410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

06/02/2005

Date terminated

08/09/2005

87 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Carlisle Corporation Rubber & Plastics Manufacturing · 46 cases
• defendant · Crompton Corporation · 47 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 48 Antitrust cases in our index naming CROMPTON CORPORATION — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Pearman v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, E.D. TennesseeFiled 01/10/2006
• Industrial Rubber Products Inc v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, D. KansasFiled 09/29/2004
• Artic-Temp, Inc v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, D. KansasFiled 09/27/2004
• Maine Industrial Tires Limited v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, D. KansasFiled 09/24/2004
• Alco Industries, Inc v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, D. KansasFiled 09/23/2004
• Creative Urethanes, Inc v. Crompton Corporation
  District Court, D. KansasFiled 09/23/2004

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Carlisle Companies Incorporated v. Crompton Corporation?

Carlisle Companies Incorporated v. Crompton Corporation is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 06/02/2005 in the District Court, N.D. New York. The case was terminated on 08/09/2005. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. New York, docket number 5:05-cv-00684.

When was the case filed?

Carlisle Companies Incorporated v. Crompton Corporation was filed on 06/02/2005. It was terminated on 08/09/2005.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act.