Carr v. Mendoza
Carr v. Mendoza is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 12/03/2020 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 02/23/2023.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Annemarie Carney Axon · 453 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:20-cv-01925
- Cause
- 31:3729 False Claims Act
31 U.S.C. § 3729 — False Claims Act - Nature of suit
- 376 Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))
Whistleblower (qui tam) actions brought on behalf of the government. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 12/03/2020
- Date terminated
- 02/23/2023
404 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Carr v. Mendoza?
Carr v. Mendoza is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 12/03/2020 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 02/23/2023. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 2:20-cv-01925.
When was the case filed?
Carr v. Mendoza was filed on 12/03/2020. It was terminated on 02/23/2023.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 31 U.S.C. § 3729 — False Claims Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 66574809 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:20-cv-01925 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).