Case v. Dayan
Case v. Dayan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/07/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/08/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Debra C. Freeman · 221 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:03-cv-08865
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/07/2003
- Date terminated
- 02/08/2006
6,326 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Case v. Dayan?
Case v. Dayan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/07/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/08/2006. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:03-cv-08865.
When was the case filed?
Case v. Dayan was filed on 11/07/2003. It was terminated on 02/08/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12078907 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:03-cv-08865 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).