Casey v. Amtrak
Casey v. Amtrak is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/31/1990 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 08/09/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Owen M. Panner · 1,588 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:90-cv-00114
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/31/1990
- Date terminated
- 08/09/1990
1,132 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Casey v. Amtrak?
Casey v. Amtrak is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/31/1990 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 08/09/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:90-cv-00114.
When was the case filed?
Casey v. Amtrak was filed on 01/31/1990. It was terminated on 08/09/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9251486 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:90-cv-00114 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).