Cashion v. Ardis
Cashion v. Ardis is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 03/12/2010 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 05/12/2010.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. South Carolina (D.S.C.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- R Bryan Harwell · 1,444 cases in index
- Docket number
- 8:10-cv-00653
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/12/2010
- Date terminated
- 05/12/2010
635 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cashion v. Ardis?
Cashion v. Ardis is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 03/12/2010 in the District Court, D. South Carolina. The case was terminated on 05/12/2010. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. South Carolina, docket number 8:10-cv-00653.
When was the case filed?
Cashion v. Ardis was filed on 03/12/2010. It was terminated on 05/12/2010.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 18005039 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:10-cv-00653 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).