Casper v. Harris Etal
Casper v. Harris Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/30/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/20/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Oklahoma (E.D. Okla.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 09/30/1988
- Date terminated
- 09/20/1989
253 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Casper · 139 cases
- defendant · Harris Etal · 44 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Casper v. Harris Etal?
Casper v. Harris Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/30/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/20/1989. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Oklahoma.
When was the case filed?
Casper v. Harris Etal was filed on 09/30/1988. It was terminated on 09/20/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9089692 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).