Castillo v. Stonelea Place LLC

Court

District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Philip M. Halpern · 354 cases in index

Docket number

7:24-cv-09756

Cause

15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

12/18/2024

33,092 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Castillo · 1269 cases
• defendant · Stonelea Place LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming Stonelea Place LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Castillo v. Stonelea Place LLC?

Castillo v. Stonelea Place LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/18/2024 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 7:24-cv-09756.

When was the case filed?

Castillo v. Stonelea Place LLC was filed on 12/18/2024. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).