Catheter Flushing v. AngioDynamics
Catheter Flushing v. AngioDynamics is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/30/2010 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/19/2011.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Tena Campbell · 2,852 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:10-cv-00963
- Cause
- 35:0271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement - Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 09/30/2010
- Date terminated
- 08/19/2011
1,135 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Catheter Flushing
- defendant · AngioDynamics · 4 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Catheter Flushing v. AngioDynamics?
Catheter Flushing v. AngioDynamics is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/30/2010 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 08/19/2011. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:10-cv-00963.
When was the case filed?
Catheter Flushing v. AngioDynamics was filed on 09/30/2010. It was terminated on 08/19/2011.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4402762 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:10-cv-00963 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).