Cavin v. CACi
Cavin v. CACi is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/21/2008 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 01/16/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James M. Rosenbaum · 5,933 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:08-cv-04984
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/21/2008
- Date terminated
- 01/16/2009
4,756 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cavin v. CACi?
Cavin v. CACi is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/21/2008 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 01/16/2009. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:08-cv-04984.
When was the case filed?
Cavin v. CACi was filed on 08/21/2008. It was terminated on 01/16/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12410199 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:08-cv-04984 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).