Chai v. Clinton
Chai v. Clinton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/12/1997 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 11/20/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Manuel L. Real · 12 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:97-cv-01201
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/12/1997
- Date terminated
- 11/20/1998
1,296 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chai v. Clinton?
Chai v. Clinton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/12/1997 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 11/20/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii, docket number 1:97-cv-01201.
When was the case filed?
Chai v. Clinton was filed on 09/12/1997. It was terminated on 11/20/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 26240817 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:97-cv-01201 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).