Chao v. Karavites
Chao v. Karavites is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/28/2001 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 03/21/2001.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Daniel B. Sparr · 2,682 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:01-cv-00357
- Cause
- 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
29 U.S.C. § 1001 - Nature of suit
- 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Plaintiff
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 02/28/2001
- Date terminated
- 03/21/2001
5,032 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chao v. Karavites?
Chao v. Karavites is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/28/2001 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 03/21/2001. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:01-cv-00357.
When was the case filed?
Chao v. Karavites was filed on 02/28/2001. It was terminated on 03/21/2001.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 1001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 19668936).