Chao v. Koresko
Chao v. Koresko is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 04/19/2004 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 03/04/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Mary A. Mclaughlin · 1,711 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:04-mc-00074
- Cause
- 28:1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 111 Miscellaneous
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Plaintiff
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 04/19/2004
- Date terminated
- 03/04/2014
36,280 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chao v. Koresko?
Chao v. Koresko is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 04/19/2004 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 03/04/2014. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:04-mc-00074.
When was the case filed?
Chao v. Koresko was filed on 04/19/2004. It was terminated on 03/04/2014.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4367543 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:04-mc-00074 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).