Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Contract Lawsuit

Chao v. Koresko

Contract Terminated 03/04/2014 District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Chao v. Koresko is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/12/2006 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 03/04/2014.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Mary A. McLaughlin · 79 cases in index
Docket number
2:06-mc-00192
Cause
Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Nature of suit
111 Miscellaneous
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Jurisdiction
Local Question
Jury demand
None
Date filed
10/12/2006
Date terminated
03/04/2014

36,280 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Chao · 1629 cases
  • defendant · Koresko · 12 cases

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chao v. Koresko?

Chao v. Koresko is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/12/2006 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 03/04/2014. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:06-mc-00192.

When was the case filed?

Chao v. Koresko was filed on 10/12/2006. It was terminated on 03/04/2014.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Contract Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4826967 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:06-mc-00192 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).