Chaplin v. Howerton
Chaplin v. Howerton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/21/1986 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/21/1986.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 4:84-cv-241
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/21/1986
- Date terminated
- 05/21/1986
15,260 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chaplin v. Howerton?
Chaplin v. Howerton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/21/1986 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/21/1986. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 4:84-cv-241.
When was the case filed?
Chaplin v. Howerton was filed on 05/21/1986. It was terminated on 05/21/1986.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8927058 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:84-cv-241 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).