Chapman v. Morgantown Operations, LLC

Court

District Court, N.D. West Virginia (N.D.W. Va.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Thomas S. Kleeh · 185 cases in index

Docket number

1:23-cv-00014

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

790 Labor: Other
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

01/30/2023

Date terminated

12/05/2023

998 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Chapman · 1864 cases
• defendant · Morgantown Operations, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming Morgantown Operations, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chapman v. Morgantown Operations, LLC?

Chapman v. Morgantown Operations, LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 01/30/2023 in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia. The case was terminated on 12/05/2023. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia, docket number 1:23-cv-00014.

When was the case filed?

Chapman v. Morgantown Operations, LLC was filed on 01/30/2023. It was terminated on 12/05/2023.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.