City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama v. Cardinal Health Inc

Court

District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Dan Aaron Polster (Mdl 2804) · 1,560 cases in index

Docket number

1:18-op-45553

Cause

18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
18 U.S.C. § 1961

Nature of suit

470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Civil racketeering claims under the RICO statute.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

05/09/2018

4,086 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama · 2 cases
• defendant · Cardinal Health Inc Wholesale Trade - Nondurable Goods · 341 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 342 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in our index naming Cardinal Health Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Poppell v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, S.D. GeorgiaFiled 05/20/2019
• Meigs County, Ohio v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, N.D. OhioFiled 04/11/2019
• County of Albany, New York v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, N.D. OhioFiled 03/25/2019
• The County of Albany, New York v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, N.D. New YorkFiled 02/27/2019
• City of Lawrence, Indiana v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, N.D. OhioFiled 07/11/2018
• City of Lawrence, Indiana v. Cardinal Health, Inc
  District Court, S.D. IndianaFiled 06/15/2018

About RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Lawsuits

This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama v. Cardinal Health Inc?

City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama v. Cardinal Health Inc is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 05/09/2018 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case is currently open in the federal court system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 1:18-op-45553.

When was the case filed?

City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama v. Cardinal Health Inc was filed on 05/09/2018. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 18 U.S.C. § 1961.