Clippinger v. Apfel
Clippinger v. Apfel is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 06/01/1998 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 09/20/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Timothy Corrigan · 94 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:98-cv-00524
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/01/1998
- Date terminated
- 09/20/2000
2,667 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Clippinger · 8 cases
- defendant · Apfel · 1552 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clippinger v. Apfel?
Clippinger v. Apfel is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 06/01/1998 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 09/20/2000. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 3:98-cv-00524.
When was the case filed?
Clippinger v. Apfel was filed on 06/01/1998. It was terminated on 09/20/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13855009 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:98-cv-00524 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).