Clooney v. Espy
Clooney v. Espy is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/10/1993 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 08/13/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Washington (W.D. Wash.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Barbara J. Rothstein · 6,432 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:93-cv-05112
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 03/10/1993
- Date terminated
- 08/13/1993
4,770 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clooney v. Espy?
Clooney v. Espy is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/10/1993 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 08/13/1993. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Washington, docket number 3:93-cv-05112.
When was the case filed?
Clooney v. Espy was filed on 03/10/1993. It was terminated on 08/13/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9554810 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:93-cv-05112 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).