Cody v. Zeneca Inc
Cody v. Zeneca Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/26/2006 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 10/17/2008.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Reginald C. Lindsay · 2,102 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:06-cv-10750
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/26/2006
- Date terminated
- 10/17/2008
1,115 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Cody · 292 cases
- defendant · Zeneca, Inc · 48 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Zeneca, Inc is named in 48 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cody v. Zeneca Inc?
Cody v. Zeneca Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/26/2006 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 10/17/2008. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:06-cv-10750.
When was the case filed?
Cody v. Zeneca Inc was filed on 04/26/2006. It was terminated on 10/17/2008.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12315601 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:06-cv-10750 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).