Cohan v. Stone
Cohan v. Stone is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/01/1992 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 05/09/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Gerard L. Goettel · 1,589 cases in index
- Docket number
- 7:92-cv-02291
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/01/1992
- Date terminated
- 05/09/1994
6,326 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cohan v. Stone?
Cohan v. Stone is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/01/1992 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 05/09/1994. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 7:92-cv-02291.
When was the case filed?
Cohan v. Stone was filed on 04/01/1992. It was terminated on 05/09/1994.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9739207 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 7:92-cv-02291 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).