Concepcion v. Traincroft, Inc

Court

District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Nathaniel M. Gorton · 3,922 cases in index

Docket number

1:21-cv-11100

Cause

15:1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 1938

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

None

Date filed

07/02/2021

Date terminated

04/17/2024

9,847 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Concepcion · 122 cases
• defendant · Traincroft, Inc · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Labor cases in our index naming TRAINCROFT, INC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Concepcion v. Traincroft, Inc?

Concepcion v. Traincroft, Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/02/2021 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 04/17/2024. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:21-cv-11100.

When was the case filed?

Concepcion v. Traincroft, Inc was filed on 07/02/2021. It was terminated on 04/17/2024.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1938.