Conlon v. Hansen
Conlon v. Hansen is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/01/2006 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 02/12/2007.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John McBryde · 5,330 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:06-cv-00619
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 09/01/2006
- Date terminated
- 02/12/2007
6,547 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Conlon v. Hansen?
Conlon v. Hansen is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/01/2006 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 02/12/2007. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 4:06-cv-00619.
When was the case filed?
Conlon v. Hansen was filed on 09/01/2006. It was terminated on 02/12/2007.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 2025730 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:06-cv-00619 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).