Connelly v. Dieter
Connelly v. Dieter is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/23/1997 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 03/06/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Janice M. Stewart · 1,776 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:97-cv-00960
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 06/23/1997
- Date terminated
- 03/06/1998
3,932 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Connelly v. Dieter?
Connelly v. Dieter is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/23/1997 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 03/06/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:97-cv-00960.
When was the case filed?
Connelly v. Dieter was filed on 06/23/1997. It was terminated on 03/06/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10666156 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:97-cv-00960 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).