Conrail v. Diamond M. Lumber
Conrail v. Diamond M. Lumber is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 05/27/1987 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 10/04/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 450 Interstate commerce
Disputes under federal commerce and interstate-commerce regulation. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/27/1987
- Date terminated
- 10/04/1988
1,811 Banking / Commerce cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Conrail · 76 cases
- defendant · Diamond M. Lumber
About Banking / Commerce Lawsuits
These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Conrail v. Diamond M. Lumber?
Conrail v. Diamond M. Lumber is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 05/27/1987 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 10/04/1988. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Banking / Commerce” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey.
When was the case filed?
Conrail v. Diamond M. Lumber was filed on 05/27/1987. It was terminated on 10/04/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Banking / Commerce Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8766449 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).