Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Copeny v. Bell

Labor Terminated 03/12/1999 District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Copeny v. Bell is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 01/26/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 03/12/1999.

Court
District Court, E.D. Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Curtis L Collier · 2,363 cases in index
Docket number
1:98-cv-00023
Nature of suit
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
01/26/1998
Date terminated
03/12/1999

2,846 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Copeny · 19 cases
  • defendant · Bell · 4818 cases

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Copeny v. Bell?

Copeny v. Bell is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 01/26/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 03/12/1999. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee, docket number 1:98-cv-00023.

When was the case filed?

Copeny v. Bell was filed on 01/26/1998. It was terminated on 03/12/1999.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 13795752).