Corbit v. Allen
Corbit v. Allen is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/01/1990 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 06/15/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Edwin L Nelson · 2,047 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:90-cv-00861
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/01/1990
- Date terminated
- 06/15/1990
1,665 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Corbit v. Allen?
Corbit v. Allen is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/01/1990 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 06/15/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 2:90-cv-00861.
When was the case filed?
Corbit v. Allen was filed on 05/01/1990. It was terminated on 06/15/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9504749 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:90-cv-00861 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).