Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuit

Curley v. Baade

Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Terminated 08/22/1995 District Court, D. New Mexico

Curley v. Baade is a federal federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/14/1994 in the District Court, D. New Mexico. The case was terminated on 08/22/1995.

Court
District Court, D. New Mexico (D.N.M.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Santiago E. Campos · 709 cases in index
Docket number
6:94-cv-01170
Nature of suit
890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
10/14/1994
Date terminated
08/22/1995

2,108 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Curley · 139 cases
  • defendant · Baade · 13 cases

About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits

This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Curley v. Baade?

Curley v. Baade is a federal federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/14/1994 in the District Court, D. New Mexico. The case was terminated on 08/22/1995. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. New Mexico, docket number 6:94-cv-01170.

When was the case filed?

Curley v. Baade was filed on 10/14/1994. It was terminated on 08/22/1995.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 10060890).