Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Patent Lawsuit

Curran v. Yorgan

Patent Terminated 12/12/1990 District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Curran v. Yorgan is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/28/1986 in the District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. The case was terminated on 12/12/1990.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin (E.D. Wis.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
10/28/1986
Date terminated
12/12/1990

723 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Curran v. Yorgan?

Curran v. Yorgan is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/28/1986 in the District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. The case was terminated on 12/12/1990. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

When was the case filed?

Curran v. Yorgan was filed on 10/28/1986. It was terminated on 12/12/1990.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Patent Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9217821 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).