Daca Design LLC v. Hangtime LLC

Court

District Court, D. New Mexico (D.N.M.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Matthew L. Garcia · 79 cases in index

Docket number

1:24-cv-00319

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement

Nature of suit

830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

04/02/2024

71 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Daca Design LLC
• defendant · Hangtime LLC · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Patent cases in our index naming Hangtime LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Hangtime LLC v. Es Distribution, LLC
  District Court, D. New MexicoFiled 01/15/2020

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Daca Design LLC v. Hangtime LLC?

Daca Design LLC v. Hangtime LLC is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/02/2024 in the District Court, D. New Mexico. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. New Mexico, docket number 1:24-cv-00319.

When was the case filed?

Daca Design LLC v. Hangtime LLC was filed on 04/02/2024. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.