Daniel v. Bachus
Daniel v. Bachus is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/23/1999 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 01/05/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Idaho (D. Idaho)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Edward J. Lodge · 2,828 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:99-cv-00354
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/23/1999
- Date terminated
- 01/05/2001
1,202 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Daniel v. Bachus?
Daniel v. Bachus is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/23/1999 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 01/05/2001. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Idaho, docket number 3:99-cv-00354.
When was the case filed?
Daniel v. Bachus was filed on 08/23/1999. It was terminated on 01/05/2001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11279010 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:99-cv-00354 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).