Dayton v. Darcy Macmanus Etal
Dayton v. Darcy Macmanus Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/18/1984 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/01/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/18/1984
- Date terminated
- 02/01/1988
33,245 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Dayton · 86 cases
- defendant · Darcy Macmanus Etal
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Dayton v. Darcy Macmanus Etal?
Dayton v. Darcy Macmanus Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/18/1984 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/01/1988. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York.
When was the case filed?
Dayton v. Darcy Macmanus Etal was filed on 12/18/1984. It was terminated on 02/01/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8535921 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).