Dea v. Comerica Bank
Dea v. Comerica Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/25/2004 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/07/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:04-mc-00010
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
- Nature of suit
- 999 Invalid
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Plaintiff
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 02/25/2004
- Date terminated
- 06/07/2004
2,445 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Dea · 271 cases
- defendant · Comerica Bank · 268 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
COMERICA BANK is named in 268 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Dea v. Comerica Bank?
Dea v. Comerica Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/25/2004 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/07/2004. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:04-mc-00010.
When was the case filed?
Dea v. Comerica Bank was filed on 02/25/2004. It was terminated on 06/07/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 22339405 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:04-mc-00010 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).